Integration of score systems, processing techniques, and value interpretation in learning evaluation
PDF (English)

Cara Mengutip

Haifa, N., Arbeni, W., Agustin, A., Wulandari, D. C., & Kaila, F. (2026). Integration of score systems, processing techniques, and value interpretation in learning evaluation. EDUCTUM: Journal Research, 5(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.56495/ejr.v5i1.1440

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the integration of scoring systems, grade processing techniques, and interpretation of learning outcomes in elementary school learning evaluations. The methodology used is a literature study with a qualitative descriptive approach through a review of various scientific journals, educational evaluation books, and assessment instruments relevant to the latest curriculum. The results show that standardized scoring has a significant effect on increasing assessment objectivity. Furthermore, systematic grade processing techniques have been shown to improve the accuracy and consistency of learning evaluation results. Accurate grade interpretation helps teachers understand student learning development more comprehensively, allowing for more precise learning decisions that are oriented towards student needs. The conclusion of this study confirms that the integration of scoring, grade processing, and interpretation of learning outcomes needs to be implemented in a single, integrated assessment system to make learning evaluations more valid, reliable, and informative.

https://doi.org/10.56495/ejr.v5i1.1440
PDF (English)

Referensi

Brookhart, S. M. (2020). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Brookhart, S. M. (2021). Grading and learning: Practices that support student achievement. Solution Tree Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2020). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications.

Ibrahim, I., & Muslimah, M. (2021). Teknik pemeriksaan jawaban, pemberian skor, konversi nilai, dan standar penilaian. Jurnal Al-Qiyam, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.33648/alqiyam.v2i1.114

Johnson, K. (2022). Data analysis techniques for educational assessment. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 10(1), 1–12.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Nurul, H. H., Sulistia, S., & Imelda, A. (2024). Teknik pengolahan skor hasil evaluasi. Jurnal Mudabbir (Journal Research and Education Studies), 4(2), 461.

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2020). A critical review of the arguments for rubric use in education. Educational Research Review, 30, 100331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100331

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications.

Sani, R. A. (2021). Penilaian autentik. Bumi Aksara.

Smith, J. (2020). The effect of scoring systems on student evaluation. Journal of Educational Research, 113(2), 123–136.

Stiggins, R. J. (2020). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right—using it well (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Sudjana, N. (2021). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Williams, P. (2021). Interpretation of student assessment data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 58(3), 345–358.

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Nisa Haifa, Wawan Arbeni, Ananda Agustin, Dwi Cahya Wulandari, Fakhra Kaila